Conflict mineral regulations still delayed

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are still wrestling with how to implement new regulations that require companies to disclose whether they use conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The Dodd Frank Act passed in 2010 included this conflict mineral legislation but it still has not been implemented by the SEC.  The US Chamber of Commerce has been arguing that it would be too costly and difficult to implemented as drafted, whilst conflict mineral campaigners argue that any dilution would let companies off the hook. The SEC now looks set to give companies a phase in period to implement the regulations.

Nonetheless the prospect of the regulations already seems to be having some impact on the ground in Congo with Global Witness reporting last year that one of the largest mines had been abandoned by the military potentially as a result of the legislation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s